I’m not a morning person

or a night time person

I don’t think I’m even a person 

Why did a 9 year old have their hands on a gun my school made us write in pencil until we were 9 because children can’t be trusted with a pen???????

ghostthatannoysyou:

Do you ever wish you could erase an album from your head and then listen to it like it’s the first time?

whenever someone is like “i’ve never heard that album” i’m like OMG I’M SO JEALOUS YOU ARE IN FOR A TREAT FRIEND

i keep looking at my work for like 30 seconds then being like… why should i give a fuck about this then tabbing back to tumblr for an hour

i honestly keep telling myself i’m gonna get some work done because these poor people are gonnabe so fucked once i go but oh well

2 days left

imsoshive:

snowsann:

this is pretty sad actually

work are so desperate for me not to leave on friday

they offered me a raise, fancy new titles, complete autonomy (all the things i ever actually wanted) and a name plaque for my desk

and actual name plaque

i mean they went and looked at them and everything

typette:

perchu:

underthesymmetree:

Fibonacci you crazy bastard….

As seen in the solar system (by no ridiculous coincidence), Earth orbits the Sun 8 times in the same period that Venus orbits the Sun 13 times! Drawing a line between Earth & Venus every week results in a spectacular FIVE side symmetry!!

Lets bring up those Fibonacci numbers again: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34..

So if we imagine planets with Fibonacci orbits, do they create Fibonacci symmetries?!

You bet!! Depicted here is a:

  • 2 sided symmetry (5 orbits x 3 orbits)
  • 3 sided symmetry (8 orbits x 5 orbits)
  • sided symmetry (13 orbits x 8 orbits) - like Earth & Venus
  • sided symmetry (21 orbits x 13 orbits)

I wonder if relationships like this exist somewhere in the universe….

Read the Book    |    Follow    |    Hi-Res    -2-    -3-    -5-    -8-

i dofnt know what any of this means but these gifs are so raw im gonna rbelog it anyway

the fibonacci sequence is as close to a universe easter egg as we can possibly get. it’s a repeating pattern of numbers that you see fucking everywhere!

it appears in shit like this, from things like mathematic fractals, to the way fruits and plants grow, to the golden ratio that ALL of our proportions fit into, and a ton of other totally unrelated fucking things like the bending of light through water, how veins, rivers and lightning are connected in pattern shapes, and so on and so on

some people say it’s evidence of god, some people say it’s an artifact of us 3D beings travelling through higher dimensions, many agree it’s the truest essence of beauty and the connection between math, science and artwork…

its p. neat tho you gotta admit

why do all you artsy fartsy i only love the earth and nature and beauty folk not appreciate fucking math which is the reason we find things beautiful and aesthetically pleasing in the first place you fucKING FUCKS

rayguncourtesan:

trust-me-im-adoctor:

redventure:

juicyjacqulyn:

entropiaorganizada:

hookteeth:

hethatcures:

This legitimately upsets me.

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.
So you might end up with more donuts.
But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?
Hrm.
HRM.

A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.
tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

god i love this site

can’t argue with science. Heretofore, I want my donuts square.

more donut per donut

rayguncourtesan:

trust-me-im-adoctor:

redventure:

juicyjacqulyn:

entropiaorganizada:

hookteeth:

hethatcures:

This legitimately upsets me.

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.

So you might end up with more donuts.

But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?

Hrm.

HRM.

A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.

The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (
R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.


tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

god i love this site

can’t argue with science. Heretofore, I want my donuts square.

more donut per donut

bullshitfeminism:

This is pretty ridiculous 

bullshitfeminism:

This is pretty ridiculous 

aviculor:

savvymavvy:

legitknits:

mcguirkthejerk:

kristinethequeen:

jimmysnowvakk:

This is what pisses me off about Tumblr. You all say you’re so accepting and you don’t want to offend anyone, but then thousands of people reblog something like this because Christians aren’t the minority. You wouldn’t want to offend a Muslim, and if this were offensive to them or another minority, there’d be so many comments about it. But everyone is completely fine with offending a non minority. “You’re not oppressed, you can’t talk!” You know what? I’m a Christian and this offends me and my faith, but nobody’s going to care about that because I’m not oppressed. Tumblr is hypocritical and that needs to stop.

Amen to the comment

Oh my precious lambs:

Examine why you are being offended. Because this is literally how a sunset works. There is not room for debate on this question. There is less room for debate on this than there is on just about any other thing. We are not reblogging because Christians aren’t the minority, dear ones. We are reblogging because after the debate a few days ago, creationists were given the opportunity to pose a question for non-creationists. One of these questions was:

"How can you explain a sunset if their is no god?" (sp.)

Questions, we assume, are posed so that someone might answer them. And yes, there is an answer of how exactly one can explain a sunset given the absence of a divine force. Now, you can certainly posit that God is the creator of all things and so all things came from him including the sun and light refraction and anthrax and kittens and famine and all that jazz.

But you don’t get to deny that THIS IS HOW A SUNSET WORKS, and of the necessary elements of this equation (Sun + Atmosphere + Angle = Sunset), God is not one of them. That’s because everything else is an observable phenomenon, and God is not. You can explain a sunset without God. You can go ahead and believe that God’s part of it all. That’s cool. Lots of people believe stuff like that, and I encourage you to delve into the ways that people make science and their faith jive. But if you are offended by being shown the basic scientific principals behind a sunset, you must be offended by damn near everything. And that seems exhausting. 

In short:

People getting butthurt over science, fucking love it.

"Stop teaching science, it offends me" 

hominishostilis:

iguessilltryitout:

anti-feminist-rayquaza:

truestfeminist:

anti-feminist-rayquaza:

thegbox:

No, no and no. REBLOG this please, this shouldn’t be allowed and we need to spread the word to everybody about this injustice!
The actual news article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2726219/Yasmin-Thomas-victim-disgusted-walked-free.html

"But womenz are so oppressed! "

You realize that he probably instigated her? People dont just do these things. You just like to hear the one side of the story that you want to.

"17 previous convictions" Are you fucking blind or what?

she’s still an angel until it’s 99 previous convictions, didn’t you know that?


“You realize that he probably instigated her?”

Where have I heard that before? Hmmm….

“She was asking for it.”

Feminists, perfectly willing to be victim-blaming pieces of SHIT when the victim is a man, and even when the woman is a blatantly VIOLENT psychopath with a history of attacking strangers. 

Society, perfectly willing to let psychotic abusive women walk free, “because vagina”. 

You know, for equality!  

Fuck truestfeminist, troll blog or not. I honestly don’t give a fuck anymore, shit’s not funny.

i was trying to not reblog so much erm social injustice but holy fuck “you realize that he probably instigated her?” is the most hypocritical piece of shit argument i’ve ever seen on this hypocritical piece of shit website

hominishostilis:

iguessilltryitout:

anti-feminist-rayquaza:

truestfeminist:

anti-feminist-rayquaza:

thegbox:

No, no and no. REBLOG this please, this shouldn’t be allowed and we need to spread the word to everybody about this injustice!

The actual news article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2726219/Yasmin-Thomas-victim-disgusted-walked-free.html

"But womenz are so oppressed! "

You realize that he probably instigated her? People dont just do these things. You just like to hear the one side of the story that you want to.

"17 previous convictions" Are you fucking blind or what?

she’s still an angel until it’s 99 previous convictions, didn’t you know that?

“You realize that he probably instigated her?” Where have I heard that before? Hmmm…. “She was asking for it.” Feminists, perfectly willing to be victim-blaming pieces of SHIT when the victim is a man, and even when the woman is a blatantly VIOLENT psychopath with a history of attacking strangers. Society, perfectly willing to let psychotic abusive women walk free, “because vagina”. You know, for equality! Fuck
truestfeminist
, troll blog or not. I honestly don’t give a fuck anymore, shit’s not funny.

i was trying to not reblog so much erm social injustice but holy fuck “you realize that he probably instigated her?” is the most hypocritical piece of shit argument i’ve ever seen on this hypocritical piece of shit website

draumbouy:

wtttl:

collababortion:

kittydoom:

salon:

We dare you to say we don’t live in a rape culture.

Amazingly, not The Onion:

“[W]e now have young men telling Bloomberg News that they basically view their female peers as rape bombs just waiting to explode and ruin their lives.”

I REPEAT: THIS IS NOT THE ONION

PLANET IS READY FOR MANDOWN CULTURE

MANDOWN MANDOWN MANDOWN MANDOWN

i swear to god youre all idiots. did you even read the fucking article?

first of all no. we do not live in a rape culture.

  Rape has actually decreased by over 80% since 1979, despite an increase in the willingness of victims in reporting it, and an increase in the overall number of rapes that were reported at allprior to discovery.   The “1 in 3/4 women” “statistic” being passed around on places like Tumblr is hilariously FALSE.  Female scholars and other journalistshave written off the concept as nothing more than a form of mass hysteria.   The leading organization devoted to helping victims of rape discourages the notion from being taught on college campuses, as it tries to take blame off of the actual rapist, and place it onto some poorly-defined, imaginary boogeyman. 

so now that we’ve put that myth to rest lets actually look at some of the stuff in this article.

Last year, a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association found that less than 30 percent of college students had more than one partner in the previous year.

now i dont know about you but one lay a year isnt really enough for me. shit if i dont have sex at least once a month i get moody. 

this article is criticizing a Bloomberg piece about mens fear of being falseley accused as rapists. which by the way is a very realistic fear.

Men who are accused of rape on a University campus can have their right of due process and trial by a jury of their peers stripped from them. In place of it, they can then be “convicted” by the university if the investigating body believes there is a 50.0001% chance that the man committed the rape.

In addition, the accused is not allowed to seek any outside legal counsel, also taking away his right to an attorney. what this means is that men are literally stripped of constitutional rights to an actual investigation and can have their entire life ruined just because some dumbass sorority girl falsely accused them. and lets be real here who do you think they’re gonna side with? thats right. the girl. nobody’s gonna side with a college guy. people already think they’re the scum of the earth right? and now they’ve got some poor girl with crocodile tears enforcing that belief. that guy is pretty much fucked.

Pollack said a patient recently told him about making out with a girl at a party. Things were going fine, the student said, when suddenly a vision of his school’s disciplinary board flew into his head.

“‘I want to go to law school or medical school after this,’” Pollack said, recounting the student’s comments. “‘I said to her, it’s been nice seeing you.’”

basically what this dude is saying is that he’s scared of even kissing a girl because she might report him for sexual assault if he hurts her feelings.

Earlier in the piece, Gill said he no longer offered female classmates beer at parties because he doesn’t want to “look like a predator … it’s a little bit of a blurred line.”

this dude wont even offer people beer at parties because girls automatically assume guys are rapists. 

and this article up here. all its doing is basically spouting nonsense saying that men are blaming rape on the victim. but thats not whats happening. MEN ARE JUST SCARD TO HAVE THEIR FUCKING LIVES RUINED FOR SOMETHING THEY NEVER DID.

and all of you fucking bought it. you just bit the hook and reblogged it without even reading the fucking thing so that you could laugh at an injustice men face. i mean its bad enough that we dont even have fucking rape legislation. and on top of that we have our constitutional rights taken  away by our college just so they can ruin our lives based on a rumor. and all you’ve done is make fun of it. 

fuck your erasure of anything that isn’t all about women.

fuck your political ignorance.

fuck this article,

and fuck you.

dickardcain:

thefeelofavideogame:

continued laughter

He’s quit twitter three times now.Once involved the cancellation of Fez 2. People defended him saying he was bullied. While ignoring the numerous times he started the shit flinging. Or when he escalated it. Marcus Beer called him a “toss pot” and a “hipster”. Phil Fish responds “Compare your life to mine and then kill yourself.” And yet no one wants to point out that’s fucked up for Phil to say. They just justify it or ignore it.The second time he quit twitter was when he went on a rant about how people who do “let’s plays” of video games should give a chunk of their money to the video game developer/publisher and that they’re “stealing”. After a flurry of people explaining exactly why he’s wrong and being a jackass. He quit twitter.The third time? He white knights Zoe Quinn, a woman who slept with video game journalists and individuals who were in positions to give her favors for sex.  This reveals a lot of the corruption in gaming journalism and the kind of incestuous hell beast that video games and their marketing has become.  He shouts down and bullies a person complaining about Zoe sexually harassing them at a wedding into apologizing and still Phil continued to insult them. He then tries the same trick on Total Biscuit when JonTron and TB agree that Zoe Quinn criticism isn’t about misogyny. It’s about ethics.When TB doesn’t back down and instead shows just how little fucks he has to give? Phil Fish throws a fit and quits Twitter for the third time.How many days do you think it’ll be before he comes back? Once again pathologically seeking attention.

dickardcain:

thefeelofavideogame:

continued laughter

He’s quit twitter three times now.

Once involved the cancellation of Fez 2. People defended him saying he was bullied. While ignoring the numerous times he started the shit flinging. Or when he escalated it. Marcus Beer called him a “toss pot” and a “hipster”. Phil Fish responds “Compare your life to mine and then kill yourself.” And yet no one wants to point out that’s fucked up for Phil to say. They just justify it or ignore it.

The second time he quit twitter was when he went on a rant about how people who do “let’s plays” of video games should give a chunk of their money to the video game developer/publisher and that they’re “stealing”. After a flurry of people explaining exactly why he’s wrong and being a jackass. He quit twitter.

The third time? He white knights Zoe Quinn, a woman who slept with video game journalists and individuals who were in positions to give her favors for sex.  This reveals a lot of the corruption in gaming journalism and the kind of incestuous hell beast that video games and their marketing has become.  He shouts down and bullies a person complaining about Zoe sexually harassing them at a wedding into apologizing and still Phil continued to insult them. He then tries the same trick on Total Biscuit when JonTron and TB agree that Zoe Quinn criticism isn’t about misogyny. It’s about ethics.

When TB doesn’t back down and instead shows just how little fucks he has to give? Phil Fish throws a fit and quits Twitter for the third time.

How many days do you think it’ll be before he comes back? Once again pathologically seeking attention.

hedgehogula:

Just a short 3-image story about keeping it real on Tumblr.

Update: the post is now at 155,000 notes.  The blog owner has deleted the original post and has been accused of making it up.  Her response is, in short, that she copied and pasted the story from a political blog that sourced CNN and added the photo herself.  She has also claimed that the original CNN source article was deleted for legal reasons.  She is receiving a lot of harassment as a result of other questionable things she’s posted and has turned off asks as a result.

The blog owner has not supplied a link to the blog from which she copy-pasted the article, nor has she supplied a link to the CNN article on which the story is based.

Update 2: Today (3-22-14), the blog owner published a text post.  The following is an excerpt.

I have come to the realization that I have delusion disorder. This causes me to believe these stories I have in my head, these stories of fear and trauma. To think they’re real. Essentially, I believe my own lies. It’s a terrifying thing to live with.

Perhaps the story of Georgian rape was a result of my delusion disorder. I posted it because I wanted people to realize and be warned about what boys and grown men can do to further the patriarchy and rape culture of the next generations. Boys are bred to violent and rapists in the backward south and people need to know about it. I feel terrible if my delusion disorder caused me to lie about it. I took down the post yesterday.

Update 3: Today (3-24-14) the blog owner changed the name of her blog.  The original URL leads to an advertisement for erotica or something, with a referral link to the new URL of the infamous blog.  It is unclear whether she changed her URL and an opportunist took it, or if she sold the URL for advertisement space.